Both fans and foes of Proposition 2 have said they will continue to press their case when state lawmakers meet soon in special session to rewrite the marijuana initiative voters apparently passed Tuesday by a narrow margin.
But lawmakers should be undeterred.
The main forces both for and against Proposition 2 agreed last month to a compromise that was to be presented to the Legislature shortly after Election Day. These forces are not the ones now advocating for something different. They don’t speak for the main participants in the initiative drive and they should not carry the day.
As part of the compromise agreement, both sides agreed to cease advertising, although they continued, when asked, to advocate for voters to either accept or reject the ballot measure.
No one knows how this may have affected the eventual outcome. The lack of a vocal, well-funded opposition may have led some to vote yes when, with a bit more education, they might have voted no.
At press time, the yes vote on Proposition 2 was leading by a 53 percent to 46 percent margin. Although the number of ballots remaining to be counted was higher than the margin separating the yes and no votes, it appeared likely the measure would pass.
But it would be unwise for lawmakers to turn their backs on a sensible and groundbreaking compromise — one that could be a model for other states to follow. Not only that, it would be dangerous.
Proposition 2 contains too many loose ends, making it difficult for law enforcement to differentiate between legal, medicinal uses of the drug and illegal possession. This, in turn, would make it more likely that minors would have access to marijuana. Research is clear on the damaging affects this could have on developing minds.
The compromise, on the other hand, makes certain that the …read more
Source:: Deseret News – Utah News